From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Mackall Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/12] netoops support Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:54:45 -0500 Message-ID: <1288817685.26428.1129.camel@calx> References: <20101103012917.4641.57113.stgit@crlf.mtv.corp.google.com> <20101103023422.GB5782@kroah.com> <20101103181634.GF7441@kroah.com> <4CD1C612.5080902@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4CD1C612.5080902-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mike Waychison Cc: Greg KH , simon.kagstrom-vI6UBbBVNY+JA8cjQkG2/g@public.gmane.org, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org, adurbin-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, chavey-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 13:29 -0700, Mike Waychison wrote: > Mike Waychison wrote: > > FWIW, another semantic difference between netconsole and netoops (that > > I had missed in the last email) is filtering: we really do want to get > > the whole log when a crash happens, debug messages and all. > > Netconsole is subject to console filtering (which we _do_ want as > > debug messages going out the uart slows the whole world down). > > > > netconsole and netoops _do_ have bits in common, for instance the > > handling of NETDEV events and source+target configuration. I'd rather > > those bits become common between the two than figure out how to jam > > the semantics we need into netconsole. > > Hi Matt, > > I've been reading through the netconsole driver in response to Greg's > comments on this thread, and it is definitely more robust in terms of > configuration and handling of network device events than the netoops > driver I proposed. I've been following the discussion to see if it went anywhere interesting.. > What are your thoughts on extending netconsole with the same sort of > semantics that are in the netoops patchset? My first thought is that it's a bit unfortunate that some of the the netconsole configgy bits weren't implemented in a generic way that would be applicable to other netpoll clients. Some people have never gotten it into their heads that netconsole isn't the only client. > I'd still like to have blit-dmesg-to-the-network-on-oops semantics, > which seems doable by having a per-target flag for streaming of console > messages (enabled by default) and a flag to emit a structured full dmesg > dump (disabled by default). I'd actually like to see you go forward with netoops. It's clear to me that it's a different beast and complexifying netconsole with a bunch of weird new options doesn't really sit well. If that means abstracting some of the sysfs crap from netconsole, great. That said, I don't think netoops is an ideal name, given how closely bound oops _events_ are with their textual output. Presumably it covers events other than oopsen like panics too. Regarding rolling oopses: lots of machines regularly survive oopses, so I think you ought to consider rate-limiting them (to a configurable rate with a very low default) rather than suppressing all but the first. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.