From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.15 04/24] Restartable sequences: x86 32/64 architecture support Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 17:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1390396579.17843.1511113291117.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> References: <20171114200414.2188-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20171114200414.2188-5-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" , Boqun Feng , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Watson , linux-kernel , linux-api , Paul Turner , Andrew Morton , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Hunter , Andi Kleen , Chris Lameter , Ben Maurer , rostedt , Josh Triplett , Linus Torvalds , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org ----- On Nov 16, 2017, at 4:14 PM, Thomas Gleixner tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org wrote: > On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > Please fix the subject line: > > x86: Add support for restartable sequences > > or something like that. > > And for the actual rseq patches please come up with a proper short > susbsytem prefix for restartable sequences. There is no point in occupying > half of the subject space for a prefix. ok. done. > > Other than that. > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Thanks! Should I apply the reviewed-by only to the x86 patches, or patch 01 (rseq: Introduce restartable sequences system call) as well ? Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com