From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 0/4] /proc/thread-self
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 19:39:55 -0700
Message-ID: <1406860795.3036.3.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
References: <87oaw5caq1.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <87oaw5caq1.fsf-JOvCrm2gF+uungPnsOpG7nhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 17:30 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> This is small chance changing /proc/net and /proc/mounts will cause
> userspace regressions (although nothing has shown up in my testing) if
> that happens we can just point the change that moves them from
> /proc/self/... to /proc/thread-self/...

Isn't breaking userspace a no no, no matter what? At least some
util-linux programs makes use of both /proc/mounts and /proc/net.