From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/exec: Check if the syscall exists and bail if not Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 13:46:32 +1100 Message-ID: <1423017992.7982.6.camel@ellerman.id.au> References: <1422935588-9973-1-git-send-email-mpe@ellerman.id.au> <54D0EA1B.1000508@osg.samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54D0EA1B.1000508-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Shuah Khan Cc: David Drysdale , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Linux API , Geert Uytterhoeven , davej-rdkfGonbjUTCLXcRTR1eJlpr/1R2p/CL@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 08:32 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 02/03/2015 12:58 AM, David Drysdale wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> On systems which don't implement sys_execveat(), this test produces a > >> lot of output. > >> > >> Add a check at the beginning to see if the syscall is present, and if > >> not just note one error and return. > >> > >> When we run on a system that doesn't implement the syscall we will get > >> ENOSYS back from the kernel, so change the logic that handles > >> __NR_execveat not being defined to also use ENOSYS rather than -ENOSYS. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman > > > > Acked-by: David Drysdale > > Thanks Michael, and David. I will queue this for 3.20 Thanks. cheers