[Patch v3 1/3] firmware: dmi_scan: rename dmi_table to dmi_decode_table

[Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk-hExfYMNmJl/Cnp4W7fqMDg@public.gmane.org>]

The "dmi_table" function looks like data instance, but it does DMI
table decode. This patch renames it to "dmi_decode_table" name as
more appropriate. That allows us to use "dmi_table" name for correct
purposes.

Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk-hExfYMNmJl/Cnp4W7fqMDg@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c b/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
index 97b1616..a864a6b 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
@@ -80,9 +80,9 @@ static const char * __init dmi_string(const struct dmi_header *dm, u8 s)
  *	We have to be cautious here. We have seen BIOSes with DMI pointers
  *	pointing to completely the wrong place for example
  */
-static void dmi_table(u8 *buf,
-		      void (*decode)(const struct dmi_header *, void *),
-		      void *private_data)
+static void dmi_decode_table(u8 *buf,
+			     void (*decode)(const struct dmi_header *, void *),
+			     void *private_data)
 {
 	u8 *data = buf;
 	int i = 0;
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int __init dmi_walk_early(void (*decode)(const struct dmi_header *,
 	if (buf == NULL)
 		return -1;
 
-	dmi_table(buf, decode, NULL);
+	dmi_decode_table(buf, decode, NULL);
 
 	add_device_randomness(buf, dmi_len);
 
@@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ int dmi_walk(void (*decode)(const struct dmi_header *, void *),
 	if (buf == NULL)
 		return -1;
 
-	dmi_table(buf, decode, private_data);
+	dmi_decode_table(buf, decode, private_data);
 
 	dmi_unmap(buf);
 	return 0;
-- 
1.9.1