From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vishal Verma Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 18/21] nd_btt: atomic sector updates Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:24:42 -0600 Message-ID: <1433960682.32607.45.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20150602001134.4506.45867.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20150602001546.4506.15713.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20150609064425.GF9804@lst.de> <1433874431.32607.37.camel@linux.intel.com> <20150610073434.GC3369@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150610073434.GC3369@lst.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Dan Williams , axboe@kernel.dk, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, rafael@kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 09:34 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi Vishal, > > I'm mostly worried about handling scalability to large CPU counts > properly. If you think this is the best way to handle it that fine, > but please document the decisions on the changelog in a similar form > to what you did below. Thanks Christoph. I'll update the changelog for the next version. Scalability and performance are of course at the top of my head - this implementation is a first shot at what we think will work best, but if there are experiments/changes/data that show otherwise, I'll be more than happy to incorporate those. -Vishal