From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yu-cheng Yu Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 14/27] mm: Handle THP/HugeTLB shadow stack page fault Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:11:03 -0700 Message-ID: <1531325463.13297.30.camel@intel.com> References: <20180710222639.8241-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20180710222639.8241-15-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20180711091022.GT2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180711091022.GT2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Ravi V. Shan List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 11:10 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 03:26:26PM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > > > > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c > > index a2695dbc0418..f7c46d61eaea 100644 > > --- a/mm/memory.c > > +++ b/mm/memory.c > > @@ -4108,7 +4108,13 @@ static int __handle_mm_fault(struct > > vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, > >   if (pmd_protnone(orig_pmd) && > > vma_is_accessible(vma)) > >   return do_huge_pmd_numa_page(&vmf, > > orig_pmd); > >   > > - if (dirty && !pmd_write(orig_pmd)) { > > + /* > > +  * Shadow stack trans huge PMDs are copy- > > on-access, > > +  * so wp_huge_pmd() on them no mater if we > > have a > > +  * write fault or not. > > +  */ > > + if (is_shstk_mapping(vma->vm_flags) || > > +     (dirty && !pmd_write(orig_pmd))) { > >   ret = wp_huge_pmd(&vmf, orig_pmd); > >   if (!(ret & VM_FAULT_FALLBACK)) > >   return ret; > Can't we do this (and the do_wp_page thing) by setting > FAULT_FLAG_WRITE > in the arch fault handler on shadow stack faults? This can work.  I don't know if that will create other issues. Let me think about that. Yu-cheng