Re: [PATCH v11 6/6] docs: mm: numaperf.rst Add brief description for access class 1.

[Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>]

Hi--

On 9/28/20 5:52 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Try to make minimal changes to the document which already describes
> access class 0 in a generic fashion (including IO initiatiors that
> are not CPUs).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
>  v11: No change.
> 
>  Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
> index 4d69ef1de830..b89bb85eac75 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst

> @@ -88,6 +93,9 @@ The latency attributes are provided in nanoseconds.
>  The values reported here correspond to the rated latency and bandwidth
>  for the platform.
>  
> +Access class 1, takes the same form, but only includes values for CPU to
> +memory activity.

-ETOOMANYCOMMAS.

Drop the first comma for sure. Maybe even the second one.

> +
>  ==========
>  NUMA Cache
>  ==========
> 

thanks.
-- 
~Randy