From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Define ENOAUTHSERVICE to indicate "Authentication service unavailable" Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:13 +0000 Message-ID: <17357.1328781673@redhat.com> References: <22934.1328745230@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20120208122905.8902.65762.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <22934.1328745230-+bZmOdGhbsPr6rcHtW+onFJE71vCis6O@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Valdis.Kletnieks-PjAqaU27lzQ@public.gmane.org Cc: dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, keyrings-6DNke4IJHB0gsBAKwltoeQ@public.gmane.org, linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, libc-alpha-9JcytcrH/bA+uJoB2kUjGw@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Valdis.Kletnieks-PjAqaU27lzQ@public.gmane.org wrote: > Was this an intentional overload of 139 (and so on for other archs)? Just > checking - I'm sure if it goes in like this, we'll see a patch to "fix" the > collision for 3.16.0 or so... ;) Ummm... Odd... I'm surprised StGIT managed to reapply my patches with no warning. I'll fix the numbering in them. David