From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.16 02/21] rseq: Introduce restartable
 sequences system call (v12)
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 19:57:08 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1772818221.34575.1513281428902.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
References: <20171214161403.30643-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20171214161403.30643-3-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712141033100.6249@nuc-kabylake> <12046460.34426.1513275177081.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712141238180.8340@nuc-kabylake> <20171214194853.GE3326@worktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20171214194853.GE3326@worktop>
Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Chris Lameter <cl-vYTEC60ixJUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org>, Dave Watson <davejwatson-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, linux-api <linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Paul Turner <pjt-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>, Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, Andrew Hunter <ahh-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Andi Kleen <andi-Vw/NltI1exuRpAAqCnN02g@public.gmane.org>, Ben Maurer <bmaurer-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>, rostedt <rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>, Josh Triplett <josh-iaAMLnmF4UmaiuxdJuQwMA@public.gmane.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>, Will
List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org

----- On Dec 14, 2017, at 2:48 PM, Peter Zijlstra peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:50:13PM -0600, Christopher Lameter wrote:
>> Ultimately I wish fast increments like done by this_cpu_inc() could be
>> implemented in an efficient way on non x86 platforms that do not have
>> cheap instructions like that.
> 
> So the problem isn't migration; for that we could wrap the operation in
> preempt_disable() which is not more expensive than rseq would be. And a
> lot more deterministic.
> 
> The problem instead is interrupts, which can result in nested load-store
> operations, and that comes apart. This then means having to disable
> interrupts over these things and _that_ is expensive.

Then could we consider checking a per task-struct rseq_cs pointer when
returning from interrupt handler ? This rseq_cs pointer would track
kernel restartable sequences. This would also work for NMI handlers.

Thanks,

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com