From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vegard Nossum Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] pipe: move limit checking logic into pipe_set_size() Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 13:26:18 +0200 Message-ID: <1e7bdfb3-0772-c152-8da1-3d22b56682b3@oracle.com> References: <3701b2c5-2c52-2c3e-226d-29b9deb29b50@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3701b2c5-2c52-2c3e-226d-29b9deb29b50@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" , Andrew Morton Cc: Willy Tarreau , socketpair@gmail.com, Tetsuo Handa , Jens Axboe , Al Viro , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joe Perches List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 08/29/2016 02:21 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > This is a preparatory patch for following work. Move the F_SETPIPE_SZ > limit-checking logic from pipe_fcntl() into pipe_set_size(). This > simplifies the code a little, and allows for reworking required in > a later patch that fixes the limit checking in pipe_set_size() > + if ((too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(pipe->user) || > + too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(pipe->user)) && > + !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) > + return -EPERM; Some might say the indentation is off here. Not sure why checkpatch didn't care. Otherwise looks fine to me. Vegard