From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] cleanup paccept Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:15:31 -0400 Message-ID: <20081028191531.GA1007@infradead.org> References: <200810281909.m9SJ9pdj003624@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200810281909.m9SJ9pdj003624-sQhldQRnEDHy+ZiRM8QlFPXAX3CI6PSWQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 03:09:51PM -0400, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > This patch doesn't change *any* functionality from what is currently > in the upstream kernel. There is no reason to start arguing again and > for me to explain everything the way I did it months ago. This is just > a *cleanup patch*, nothing else. If you want to know why this cleanup > is needed read the discussions of Umm, it does enabled functionality that wasn't enabled before. And that functionality includes a syscall. So any chance you could write a proper changelog that describes what you actually do instead of lots of ranting and references to old posts? And no "[PATCH] cleanup paccept" isn't really a good subject for adding a new syscalls either. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html