From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][RFC] add MAP_UNLOCKED mmap flag
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 13:03:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091008110324.GA31065@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091008094055.GE16702@redhat.com>
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:40:55AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:37:52AM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:53:44PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:34:36PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:02:18PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mman.h b/include/asm-generic/mman.h
> > > > > index 32c8bd6..59e0f29 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/asm-generic/mman.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/asm-generic/mman.h
> > > > > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > > > > #define MAP_NONBLOCK 0x10000 /* do not block on IO */
> > > > > #define MAP_STACK 0x20000 /* give out an address that is best suited for process/thread stacks */
> > > > > #define MAP_HUGETLB 0x40000 /* create a huge page mapping */
> > > > > +#define MAP_UNLOCKED 0x80000 /* force page unlocking */
> > > > >
> > > > > #define MCL_CURRENT 1 /* lock all current mappings */
> > > > > #define MCL_FUTURE 2 /* lock all future mappings */
> > > > > diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> > > > > index 73f5e4b..7c2abdb 100644
> > > > > --- a/mm/mmap.c
> > > > > +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> > > > > @@ -985,6 +985,9 @@ unsigned long do_mmap_pgoff(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> > > > > if (!can_do_mlock())
> > > > > return -EPERM;
> > > > >
> > > > > + if (flags & MAP_UNLOKED)
> > > > > + vm_flags &= ~VM_LOCKED;
> > >
> > > > Should we do something special about (MAP_UNLOCKED | MAP_LOCKED)?
> > >
> > > It is simpler to just ignore it. What do you think?
> >
> > I think we should filter it out. It's unlocking even when MAP_LOCKED
> > is set and doing mlock-specific checks also no mlock will happen.
>
> What do you mean by "filter it out"? Return error.
Yes, sorry for being vague. I mean returning -EINVAL for both flags
being set.
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-08 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-06 17:02 [PATCH v2][RFC] add MAP_UNLOCKED mmap flag Gleb Natapov
2009-10-06 18:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-06 18:34 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-10-06 18:53 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-10-08 9:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-10-08 9:40 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-10-08 11:03 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091008110324.GA31065@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).