From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fadvise: introduce POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED_FS Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 14:44:11 -0700 Message-ID: <20110504144411.7f32c00c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1303928027-5100-1-git-send-email-andrea@betterlinux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1303928027-5100-1-git-send-email-andrea-oIIqvOZpAevzfdHfmsDf5w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Andrea Righi Cc: Dave Chinner , Mike Frysinger , Al Viro , Arnd Bergmann , linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 20:13:47 +0200 Andrea Righi wrote: > Introduce a new fadvise flag to drop page cache pages of a single > filesystem. I'm going to object to this on general principle. We shouldn't toss new features into the kernel API just because we can. Each feature needs a really good argument to justify its inclusion, and I don't believe that the case has been made for this feature. IOW, who's going to die if we don't merge it?