From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrea Righi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fadvise: introduce POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED_FS Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 00:09:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20110504220922.GA4811@linux.develer.com> References: <1303928027-5100-1-git-send-email-andrea@betterlinux.com> <20110504144411.7f32c00c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110504144411.7f32c00c.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Dave Chinner , Mike Frysinger , Al Viro , Arnd Bergmann , linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:44:11PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 20:13:47 +0200 > Andrea Righi wrote: > > > Introduce a new fadvise flag to drop page cache pages of a single > > filesystem. > > I'm going to object to this on general principle. We shouldn't toss > new features into the kernel API just because we can. Each feature > needs a really good argument to justify its inclusion, and I don't > believe that the case has been made for this feature. > > IOW, who's going to die if we don't merge it? OK. :) -Andrea