From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)"
<mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
Dario Faggioli <raistlin-k2GhghHVRtY@public.gmane.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Linux API <linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [SCHED_DEADLINE man pages 2/2] sched(7) SCHED_DEADLINE
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 17:52:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140513175210.49eed2e34ac06a3c109ce963@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537233A9.6040102-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Hello,
On Tue, 13 May 2014 17:00:57 +0200
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Hello Peter et al.
>
> Here is the section of the sched(7) page that describes SCHED_DEADLINE,
> as rendered text, with the (entire) raw page source attached. Please
> carefully review.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
> SCHED_DEADLINE: Sporadic task model deadline scheduling
> Since version 3.14, Linux provides a deadline scheduling pol‐
> icy (SCHED_DEADLINE). This policy is currently implemented
> using GEDF (Global Earliest Deadline First) in conjunction
> with CBS (Constant Bandwidth Server). To set and fetch this
> policy and associated attributes, one must use the Linux-spe‐
> cific sched_setattr(2) and sched_getattr(2) system calls.
>
> A sporadic task is one that has a sequence of jobs, where
> each job is activated at most once per period. Each job also
> has a relative deadline, before which it should finish execu‐
> tion, and a computation time, which is the CPU time necessary
> for executing the job. The moment when a task wakes up
> because a new job has to be executed is called the arrival
> time (also referred to as the request time or release time).
> The start time is the time at which a task starts its execu‐
> tion. The absolute deadline is thus obtained by adding the
> relative deadline to the arrival time.
>
> The following diagram clarifies these terms:
>
> arrival/wakeup absolute deadline
> | start time |
> | | |
> v v v
> -----x--------xooooooooooooooooo-------x--------x---
> |<- comp. time ->|
> |<------- relative deadline ----->|
> |<-------------- period ------------------>|
>
> When setting a SCHED_DEADLINE policy for a thread using
> sched_setattr(2), one can specify three parameters: Runtime,
> Deadline, and Period. These parameters do not necessarily
> correspond to the aforementioned terms: usual practice is to
> set Runtime to something bigger than the average computation
> time (or worst-case execution time for hard real-time tasks),
> Deadline to the relative deadline, and Period to the period
> of the task. Thus, for SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling, we have:
>
> arrival/wakeup absolute deadline
> | start time |
> | | |
> v v v
> -----x--------xooooooooooooooooo-------x--------x---
> |<-- Runtime --->|
|<-- Runtime --->|
I originally drew this slightly bigger than comp. time above because we
usually don't want tasks to be throttled in the average case. It's just
a rule of thumb.
> |<----------- Deadline ---------->|
> |<-------------- Period ------------------>|
>
> The three deadline-scheduling parameters correspond to the
> sched_runtime, sched_deadline, and sched_period fields of the
> sched_attr structure; see sched_setattr(2). These fields
> express value in nanoseconds. If sched_period is specified
> as 0, then it is made the same as sched_deadline.
>
> The kernel requires that:
>
> sched_runtime <= sched_deadline <= sched_period
>
> In addition, under the current implementation, all of the
> parameter values must be at least 1024 (i.e., just over one
> microsecond, which is the resolution of the implementation).
And below 2^63, as per the last bug fix we discussed.
> If any of these checks fails, sched_setattr(2) fails with the
> error EINVAL.
>
> The CBS guarantees non-interference between tasks, by throt‐
> tling threads that attempt to over-run their specified Run‐
> time.
>
> To ensure deadline scheduling guarantees, the kernel must
> prevent situations where the set of SCHED_DEADLINE threads is
> not feasible (schedulable) within the given constraints. The
> kernel thus performs an admittance test when setting or
> changing SCHED_DEADLINE policy and attributes. This admis‐
> sion test calculates whether the change is feasible; if it is
> not sched_setattr(2) fails with the error EBUSY.
>
> For example, it is required (but not necessarily sufficient)
> for the total utilization to be less than or equal to the
> total number of CPUs available, where, since each thread can
> maximally run for Runtime per Period, that thread's utiliza‐
> tion is its Runtime divided by its Period.
>
> In order to fulfil the guarantees that are made when a thread
> is admitted to the SCHED_DEADLINE policy, SCHED_DEADLINE
> threads are the highest priority (user controllable) threads
> in the system; if any SCHED_DEADLINE thread is runnable, it
> will preempt any thread scheduled under one of the other
> policies.
>
> A call to fork(2) by a thread scheduled under the SCHED_DEAD‐
> LINE policy will fail with the error EAGAIN, unless the
> thread has its reset-on-fork flag set (see below).
>
> A SCHED_DEADLINE thread that calls sched_yield(2) will yield
> the current job and wait for a new period to begin.
>
Thanks,
- Juri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-13 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-13 14:54 [SCHED_DEADLINE man pages 0/2] Summary Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-13 14:57 ` [SCHED_DEADLINE man pages 1/2] sched_setattr.2 Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-13 15:00 ` [SCHED_DEADLINE man pages 2/2] sched(7) SCHED_DEADLINE Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
[not found] ` <537233A9.6040102-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-13 15:52 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
[not found] ` <20140513175210.49eed2e34ac06a3c109ce963-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-13 17:54 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
[not found] ` <53723235.40101-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-13 15:27 ` [SCHED_DEADLINE man pages 0/2] Summary Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-13 17:56 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-13 15:54 ` Juri Lelli
[not found] ` <20140513175416.765abe5b536257ab72d827bc-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-13 18:00 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140513175210.49eed2e34ac06a3c109ce963@gmail.com \
--to=juri.lelli-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=raistlin-k2GhghHVRtY@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).