From: Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Jonas Bonn <jonas-A9uVI2HLR7kOP4wsBPIw7w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-ZwoEplunGu2h2975yA52AaxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Eric Paris <eparis-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Stefan Kristiansson
<stefan.kristiansson-MbMCFXIvDHJFcC0YU169RA@public.gmane.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] next: openrisc: Fix build
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:48:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140926154857.GB7174@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <542573DF.3040405-A9uVI2HLR7kOP4wsBPIw7w@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 04:10:39PM +0200, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> On 09/26/2014 03:54 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > openrisc:defconfig fails to build in next-20140926 with the following error.
> >
> > In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:31:0:
> > ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h: In function 'syscall_get_arch':
> > ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h:77:9: error: 'EM_OPENRISC' undeclared
> >
> > Fix by moving EM_OPENRISC and EM_OR32 to include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h.
> >
> > Fixes: ce5d112827e5 ("ARCH: AUDIT: implement syscall_get_arch for all arches")
> > Cc: Eric Paris <eparis-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson-MbMCFXIvDHJFcC0YU169RA@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> > Based Stefan's note. No idea if it is the correct fix.
> >
> > arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h | 4 +---
> > include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h b/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> > index f02ea58..e75fdce 100644
> > --- a/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> > +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> > @@ -55,9 +55,7 @@ typedef elf_greg_t elf_gregset_t[ELF_NGREG];
> > /* A placeholder; OR32 does not have fp support yes, so no fp regs for now. */
> > typedef unsigned long elf_fpregset_t;
> >
> > -/* This should be moved to include/linux/elf.h */
> > -#define EM_OR32 0x8472
> > -#define EM_OPENRISC 92 /* OpenRISC 32-bit embedded processor */
> > +/* EM_OPENRISC and EM_OR32 defined in linux/elf-em.h */
> >
> > /*
> > * These are used to set parameters in the core dumps.
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h b/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> > index 01529bd..c5d3948 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> > @@ -32,11 +32,13 @@
> > #define EM_V850 87 /* NEC v850 */
> > #define EM_M32R 88 /* Renesas M32R */
> > #define EM_MN10300 89 /* Panasonic/MEI MN10300, AM33 */
> > +#define EM_OPENRISC 92 /* OpenRISC 32-bit embedded processor */
> > #define EM_BLACKFIN 106 /* ADI Blackfin Processor */
> > #define EM_TI_C6000 140 /* TI C6X DSPs */
> > #define EM_AARCH64 183 /* ARM 64 bit */
> > #define EM_FRV 0x5441 /* Fujitsu FR-V */
> > #define EM_AVR32 0x18ad /* Atmel AVR32 */
> > +#define EM_OR32 0x8472 /* OpenRISC, alternate */
> Have these codes hit upstream binutils yet? Did they both go upstream
> of only one of them? Is there any chance they are going to change
> again? I think that's the reason these have been lingering in
> arch/openrisc instead of the generic header.
>
EM_OPENRISC is there. EM_OR32 isn't.
I'll redo the patch and only move EM_OPENRISC to the common file.
Thanks,
Guenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-26 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-26 13:54 [PATCH] next: openrisc: Fix build Guenter Roeck
2014-09-26 14:10 ` Jonas Bonn
[not found] ` <542573DF.3040405-A9uVI2HLR7kOP4wsBPIw7w@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-26 15:48 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140926154857.GB7174@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux-0h96xk9xttrk1umjsbkqmq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=eparis-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jonas-A9uVI2HLR7kOP4wsBPIw7w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-ZwoEplunGu2h2975yA52AaxOck334EZe@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=stefan.kristiansson-MbMCFXIvDHJFcC0YU169RA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox