From: Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas-A9uVI2HLR7kOP4wsBPIw7w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-73nT9ZVIoz3k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Stefan Kristiansson
<stefan.kristiansson-MbMCFXIvDHJFcC0YU169RA@public.gmane.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] next: openrisc: Fix build
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:08:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140926180813.GA19291@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411753981.2739.16.camel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:53:01PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> Would you like me to carry this in the audit tree, since I'm the one who
> broke it?
>
Hi Eric,
guess you are asking Jonas, but it would make sense to me.
Guenter
> -Eric
>
> On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 09:05 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > openrisc:defconfig fails to build in next-20140926 with the following error.
> >
> > In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:31:0:
> > ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h: In function 'syscall_get_arch':
> > ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h:77:9: error: 'EM_OPENRISC' undeclared
> >
> > Fix by moving EM_OPENRISC to include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h.
> >
> > Fixes: ce5d112827e5 ("ARCH: AUDIT: implement syscall_get_arch for all arches")
> > Cc: Eric Paris <eparis-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson-MbMCFXIvDHJFcC0YU169RA@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> > v2: Only move EM_OPENRISC.
> >
> > Another possible solution for the problem would be to include asm/elf.h
> > in arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c. I had actually submitted a patch with
> > that fix back in August (maybe that is where I remembered the problem from).
> > Wonder what happened with that patch.
> >
> > Would it make sense to drop EM_OR32 and replace it with EM_OPENRISC where
> > it is used ? binutils seems to suggest that EM_OPENRISC is the "official"
> > definition.
> >
> > arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h | 3 +--
> > include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h b/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> > index f02ea58..8884276 100644
> > --- a/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> > +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> > @@ -55,9 +55,8 @@ typedef elf_greg_t elf_gregset_t[ELF_NGREG];
> > /* A placeholder; OR32 does not have fp support yes, so no fp regs for now. */
> > typedef unsigned long elf_fpregset_t;
> >
> > -/* This should be moved to include/linux/elf.h */
> > +/* EM_OPENRISC is defined in linux/elf-em.h */
> > #define EM_OR32 0x8472
> > -#define EM_OPENRISC 92 /* OpenRISC 32-bit embedded processor */
> >
> > /*
> > * These are used to set parameters in the core dumps.
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h b/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> > index 01529bd..aa90bc9 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> > #define EM_V850 87 /* NEC v850 */
> > #define EM_M32R 88 /* Renesas M32R */
> > #define EM_MN10300 89 /* Panasonic/MEI MN10300, AM33 */
> > +#define EM_OPENRISC 92 /* OpenRISC 32-bit embedded processor */
> > #define EM_BLACKFIN 106 /* ADI Blackfin Processor */
> > #define EM_TI_C6000 140 /* TI C6X DSPs */
> > #define EM_AARCH64 183 /* ARM 64 bit */
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-26 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-26 16:05 [PATCH v2] next: openrisc: Fix build Guenter Roeck
2014-09-26 17:51 ` Jonas Bonn
[not found] ` <5425A7B5.10209-A9uVI2HLR7kOP4wsBPIw7w@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-26 18:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-09-27 4:13 ` Stefan Kristiansson
2014-09-26 17:53 ` Eric Paris
[not found] ` <1411753981.2739.16.camel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-26 18:08 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-09-26 18:18 ` Jonas Bonn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140926180813.GA19291@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux-0h96xk9xttrk1umjsbkqmq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=eparis-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jonas-A9uVI2HLR7kOP4wsBPIw7w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-73nT9ZVIoz3k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=stefan.kristiansson-MbMCFXIvDHJFcC0YU169RA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).