From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
virtualization-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 09/16] virtio: set FEATURES_OK
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:28:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141023142808.377551d8.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414003404-505-10-git-send-email-mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 21:44:44 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> set FEATURES_OK as per virtio 1.0 spec
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 2 ++
> drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> dev->config->finalize_features(dev);
>
> + if (virtio_has_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
> + add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FEATURES_OK);
> + status = dev->config->get_status(dev);
> + if (!(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FEATURES_OK)) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "virtio: device refuses features: %x\n",
> + status);
> + err = -ENODEV;
> + goto err;
> + }
> + }
> +
Ugh, I just realize that virtio-ccw has a problem with that mechanism :(
Up to now, the driver only propagated status to the device: For
virtio-ccw, this was easily implemented via a ccw that transmitted
"status" to the device. However, the "read back status" part now
actually requires that the driver can get "status" from the device, or
has a comparable way to find out that the device won't accept the
status it tried to write.
I can think of two solutions:
(1) Introduce a new ccw that actually reads the device status.
(2) Make the WRITE_STATUS ccw fail (with a unit check) if the driver
sets FEATURES_OK after it tried to set features the device won't
accept.
(1) is probably more generic, while (2) is more straightforward to
implement.
Good thing we actually try to finally implement this, I did not notice
this problem during the review :(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-23 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1414003404-505-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
2014-10-22 18:44 ` [PATCH RFC v3 01/16] virtio: memory access APIs Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-23 7:54 ` Cornelia Huck
[not found] ` <20141023095405.6bdd5a1a.cornelia.huck-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-10-23 9:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-22 18:44 ` [PATCH RFC v3 05/16] virtio: add virtio 1.0 feature bit Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-23 11:57 ` Cornelia Huck
2014-10-22 18:44 ` [PATCH RFC v3 09/16] virtio: set FEATURES_OK Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <1414003404-505-10-git-send-email-mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-10-23 12:28 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2014-10-23 12:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-23 13:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2014-10-23 14:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-22 18:45 ` [PATCH RFC v3 15/16] virtio_net: fix types for in memory structures Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-22 18:45 ` [PATCH RFC v3 16/16] virtio_blk: " Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141023142808.377551d8.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--to=cornelia.huck-ta70fqpds9bqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mst-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=virtualization-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).