From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Milosz Tanski <milosz@adfin.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke@sernet.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] vfs: Non-blockling buffered fs read (page cache only)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:39:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141114163912.GA23769@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49mw7tyc7e.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:32:53AM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > Can you write a test (or set of) for fstests that exercises this new
> > functionality? I'm not worried about performance, just
> > correctness....
>
> On the subject of testing, I added support to trinity (attached,
> untested). That did raise one question. Do we expect applications to
> #include <linux/fs.h> to get the RWF_NONBLOCK definition?
Trinity will at least need an addition to include/compat.h for
older headers that won't have the definition. Looks ok otherwise.
Also, I usually sit on stuff like this until the syscall numbers are
in Linus tree. This is 3.19 stuff I presume ?
istr akpm picked up execveat recently, so if that goes in first, we'll
need to respin this anyway..
Dave
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-14 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-10 16:40 [PATCH v6 0/7] vfs: Non-blockling buffered fs read (page cache only) Milosz Tanski
2014-11-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] vfs: Prepare for adding a new preadv/pwritev with user flags Milosz Tanski
2014-11-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] vfs: Define new syscalls preadv2,pwritev2 Milosz Tanski
2014-11-11 21:09 ` Jeff Moyer
2014-11-12 13:18 ` mohanty bhagaban
2014-11-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] x86: wire up preadv2 and pwritev2 Milosz Tanski
2014-11-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] vfs: RWF_NONBLOCK flag for preadv2 Milosz Tanski
2014-11-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] xfs: add RWF_NONBLOCK support Milosz Tanski
2014-11-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] fs: pass iocb to generic_write_sync Milosz Tanski
2014-11-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] fs: add a flag for per-operation O_DSYNC semantics Milosz Tanski
2014-11-11 6:44 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] vfs: Non-blockling buffered fs read (page cache only) Dave Chinner
2014-11-11 16:02 ` Milosz Tanski
2014-11-11 17:03 ` Jeff Moyer
2014-11-11 21:42 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-11 23:21 ` Jeff Moyer
2014-11-11 22:49 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-11 23:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-11 21:40 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-14 16:32 ` Jeff Moyer
2014-11-14 16:39 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2014-11-14 16:51 ` Jeff Moyer
2014-11-14 18:46 ` Milosz Tanski
[not found] ` <20141114163912.GA23769-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-14 18:45 ` Milosz Tanski
2014-11-14 18:52 ` Jeff Moyer
[not found] ` <cover.1415636409.git.milosz-B5zB6C1i6pkAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-24 9:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-25 23:01 ` Andrew Morton
2014-12-02 22:17 ` Milosz Tanski
2014-12-02 22:42 ` Andrew Morton
2014-12-03 9:10 ` Volker Lendecke
2014-12-03 16:48 ` Milosz Tanski
[not found] ` <CANP1eJGVyBOt1rQ8jA4tMrNGX5X61-UWbVy6kKj_ByeTqAEOBQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-04 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2014-12-05 8:17 ` Volker Lendecke
2015-01-21 14:55 ` Milosz Tanski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141114163912.GA23769@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=Volker.Lendecke@sernet.de \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=milosz@adfin.com \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).