From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: One Thousand Gnomes Subject: Re: Why not make kdbus use CUSE? Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 14:23:11 +0000 Message-ID: <20141201142311.37c81ff1@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> References: <20141129063416.GE32286@woodpecker.gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141129063416.GE32286-WkJ4KB730YtOk+SH+krGketnjj8NnB7F@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Richard Yao Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org > told quite plainly that such distributions are not worth consideration. If kdbus > is merged despite concerns about security and backward compatibility, could we > at least have the shim moved to libc netural place, like Linus' tree? I would expect any other libc would fork the shim anyway (or just not bother with systemd in most cases). Alan