From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 linux-trace 1/8] tracing: attach eBPF programs to tracepoints and syscalls Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 07:27:45 -0500 Message-ID: <20150210072745.09ce84f4@grimm.local.home> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Masami Hiramatsu , Linux API , Network Development , LKML List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:51:05 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > Looks like this is entirely perf based and does not interact with > > ftrace at all. In other words, it's perf not tracing. > > > > It makes more sense to go through tip than the tracing tree. > > well, all of earlier series were based on ftrace only, > but I was given convincing enough arguments that > perf_even_open+ioctl is a better interface :) > Ok. will rebase on tip in the next version. That's fine. If this proves useful, I'll probably add the interface back to ftrace as well. -- Steve