From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilities: Ambient capability set V1 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:34:05 -0600 Message-ID: <20150226203405.GB18926@mail.hallyn.com> References: <20150224154715.GA20682@mail.hallyn.com> <20150224164429.GB29685@ubuntumail> <20150225033247.GC29685@ubuntumail> <20150226153524.GC15182@mail.hallyn.com> <20150226193200.GA17709@mail.hallyn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Lameter Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Serge Hallyn , Serge Hallyn , Andy Lutomirski , Aaron Jones , Ted Ts'o , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linuxfoundation.org, "Andrew G. Morgan" , Mimi Zohar , Austin S Hemmelgarn , Markku Savela , Jarkko Sakkinen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Michael Kerrisk , Jonathan Corbet List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 02:13:00PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > Andrew Morgan was against that. What if we changed > > > > pE' = pP' & (fE | pA) > > > > to > > > > if (pA) > > pE' = pP' & fE > > else > > pE' = pP' > > > > Same problem as before. The ambient bits will not be set in pE'. And what if I weren't scatterbrained and we did if (pA) pE' = pP' else pE' = pP' & fE All pP' bits would be set in pE'.