From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] userfaultfd v4 Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 14:38:01 -0700 Message-ID: <20150519143801.8ba477c3813e93a2637c19cf@linux-foundation.org> References: <1431624680-20153-1-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1431624680-20153-1-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Emelyanov , Sanidhya Kashyap , zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com, Linus Torvalds , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andres Lagar-Cavilla , Dave Hansen , Paolo Bonzini , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , Andy Lutomirski , Hugh Dickins , Peter Feiner , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Johannes Weiner , "Huangpeng (Peter)" List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 14 May 2015 19:30:57 +0200 Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > This is the latest userfaultfd patchset against mm-v4.1-rc3 > 2015-05-14-10:04. It would be useful to have some userfaultfd testcases in tools/testing/selftests/. Partly as an aid to arch maintainers when enabling this. And also as a standalone thing to give people a practical way of exercising this interface. What are your thoughts on enabling userfaultfd for other architectures, btw? Are there good use cases, are people working on it, etc? Also, I assume a manpage is in the works? Sooner rather than later would be good - Michael's review of proposed kernel interfaces has often been valuable. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org