From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Zviagintsev Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/kdbus: handle cap_get_proc() error properly Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:46:49 +0300 Message-ID: <20150617164649.GY4549@localhost.localdomain> References: <1434550697-24785-1-git-send-email-sergei@s15v.net> <20150617143720.GA19114@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150617143720.GA19114-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Daniel Mack , David Herrmann , Djalal Harouni , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 07:37:20AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > You sent 5 patches, yet no hints as to what order they should be applied > in :( > > Please resend in a patch series that is properly threaded so we can > handle this correctly. Thank you for feedback! I've resent series threaded: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1434558808-16129-1-git-send-email-sergei-E844GTqJAzo@public.gmane.org It was unclear for me whether to use threaded layout and whether not, but now it seems that I got it. Though those applied fine in any order and had no chances to piss of a kernel maintainer :)