From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Mux n_gsm: Add a DLCI hangup state and callback Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:04:48 -0700 Message-ID: <20150629160448.GC7455@kroah.com> References: <1435593236.25711.3.camel@tldlab125> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1435593236.25711.3.camel@tldlab125> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Gwenn =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bourr=E9e?= Cc: jslaby@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:53:56PM +0200, Gwenn Bourr=E9e wrote: >=20 > Dear kernel tty maintainers, > =20 > Please review the following patch: >=20 > From 6e006bd522124d0e8a2f6075099a21f7051a426f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 200= 1 > From: Gwenn Bourree > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:26:01 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Mux n_gsm: Add a DLCI hangup state and callback >=20 > Use of asynchronous hangup instead of vhangup. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Gwenn Bourree > Signed-off-by: Gwenn Bourree > Signed-off-by: Mustapha Ben Zoubeir > Signed-off-by: Nicolas LOUIS > Reviewed-by: Ravindran, Arun =20 > --- > drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Same comments on this one, but as you are wanting to send a series of patches, send a series of patches, each one numbered properly, otherwis= e I have no idea what order to apply them in. greg k-h