From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 14/14] kthread_worker: Add set_kthread_worker_scheduler*() Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 21:48:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20150728194820.GE19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1438094371-8326-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> <1438094371-8326-15-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> <20150728174154.GG5322@mtj.duckdns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150728174154.GG5322-qYNAdHglDFBN0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Petr Mladek , Andrew Morton , Oleg Nesterov , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , "Paul E. McKenney" , Josh Triplett , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Jiri Kosina , Borislav Petkov , Michal Hocko , linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, Vlastimil Babka , live-patching-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 01:41:54PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:39:31PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > > +/** > > + * set_kthread_worker_scheduler - change the scheduling policy and/or RT > > + * priority of a kthread worker. > > + * @worker: target kthread_worker > > + * @policy: new policy > > + * @sched_priority: new RT priority > > + * > > + * Return: 0 on success. An error code otherwise. > > + */ > > +int set_kthread_worker_scheduler(struct kthread_worker *worker, > > + int policy, int sched_priority) > > +{ > > + return __set_kthread_worker_scheduler(worker, policy, sched_priority, > > + true); > > +} > > Ditto. I don't get why we would want these thin wrappers. On top of which this is an obsolete interface :-)