linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>David
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] Documentation: describe how to add a system call
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:02:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150731010234.GA7265@x> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jJwtVgPmmMHiR0M27he3ma7exfSH8OBNdLMFQcbbtzUfg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:03:43PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:21:54AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> I like this, it's a good description of both options. I'm still biased
> >> about the approach: I prefer flags, since pointers to user structures
> >> complicate syscall filtering. ;)
> >
> > Seems like we should do two things to make that easier:
> >
> > 1) Create a standardized kernel mechanism for parameter-struct handling,
> >    implementing the recommendations mentioned here.
> 
> It's been suggested in the past that nlmsg is appropriate for such a
> thing, but I remain suspicious. :)

Likewise. :)

> > 2) Integrate into that mechanism a way to filter the resulting parameter
> >    struct with BPF *after* it has been copied to kernel space (and thus
> >    can no longer be tampered with).
> 
> Yeah, this is a irritating part: the structures operated on are copied
> from userspace adhoc in each syscall. Doing argument checking would
> mean double copies initially, and perhaps teaching syscalls about
> optional "already copied" arguments or something as an optimization.

No, double copies can't work for security reasons.  Because otherwise
you could race the kernel from another thread, substituting different
values after the check and before the use.

I think the right API looks *roughly* like this:

int _copy_param_struct(size_t kernel_len, void *kernel_struct, size_t user_len, void __user *user_struct)
{
	if (user_len > kernel_len)
		return -EINVAL;
	if (user_len && copy_from_user(kernel_struct, user_struct, user_len))
		return -EFAULT;
	if (user_len < kernel_len)
		memset(kernel_struct + user_len, 0, kernel_len - user_len);
	return 0;
}

#define copy_param_struct(kernel_struct, user_len, user_struct) _copy_param_struct( \
		sizeof(*kernel_struct) + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(!__same_type(*kernel_struct, *user_struct)), \
		kernel_struct, user_len, user_struct)


Then the syscall looks like this:

SYSCALL_DEFINEn(xyzzy, ..., ..., size_t user_params_len, struct xyzzy_params __user *user_params)
{
	int ret;
	struct xyzzy_params params;

	ret = copy_param_struct(&params, user_params_len, user_params);
	if (ret)
		return ret;
	...


And you could then hook copy_params_struct to add arbitrary additional
syscall parameter validation.  Bonus if there's some way to make the
copy and validation occur before the syscall is ever invoked, rather
than inside the syscall, but that would require adding fancier syscall
definition mechanisms that autogenerate such code.

- Josh Triplett

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-31  1:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-30  7:52 [PATCHv2 0/1] Document how to add a new syscall David Drysdale
2015-07-30  7:52 ` [PATCHv2 1/1] Documentation: describe how to add a system call David Drysdale
2015-07-30  8:38   ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found]     ` <20150730083831.GA22182-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-30 11:10       ` David Drysdale
2015-07-30 18:21         ` Kees Cook
     [not found]           ` <CAGXu5j+5KHy68ELU6PmNWaj7mQBXTbRQGXqJFwsXHt9n0LPw8Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-30 19:04             ` Josh Triplett
2015-07-30 20:03               ` Kees Cook
2015-07-31  1:02                 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2015-07-31  1:03                   ` Josh Triplett
2015-07-31 18:56                   ` Kees Cook
2015-07-31 20:59                     ` josh
2015-07-31 21:19                       ` Andy Lutomirski
     [not found]                         ` <CALCETrUkMXvFRKdTH7ekY7FyGvbKDDJbf7L0shgs5R-Hep6bVA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-31 22:08                           ` josh-iaAMLnmF4UmaiuxdJuQwMA
2015-07-31 22:54                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-01  4:32                               ` Josh Triplett
2015-08-01  4:56                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]                                   ` <55BC518E.4010102-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-01  6:18                                     ` Josh Triplett
2015-08-01  6:28                                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-07-30 18:22     ` Josh Triplett
2015-07-30 16:30   ` Cyril Hrubis
2015-07-30 16:45     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-07-30 18:50   ` Josh Triplett
2015-07-31  9:48     ` David Drysdale
2015-07-31 13:06       ` Josh Triplett
2015-07-31 14:42         ` David Drysdale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150731010234.GA7265@x \
    --to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=drysdale@google.com \
    --cc=emunson@akamai.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).