From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tycho Andersen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] ebpf: add a way to dump an eBPF program Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:44:51 -0600 Message-ID: <20150911144451.GJ27574@smitten> References: <1441930862-14347-1-git-send-email-tycho.andersen@canonical.com> <1441930862-14347-4-git-send-email-tycho.andersen@canonical.com> <55F2D982.8010406@iogearbox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55F2D982.8010406@iogearbox.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Kees Cook , Alexei Starovoitov , "David S. Miller" , Will Drewry , Oleg Nesterov , Andy Lutomirski , Pavel Emelyanov , "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:39:14PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 09/11/2015 02:21 AM, Tycho Andersen wrote: > >This commit adds a way to dump eBPF programs. The initial implementation > >doesn't support maps, and therefore only allows dumping seccomp ebpf > >programs which themselves don't currently support maps. > > > >v2: don't export a prog_id for the filter > > > >Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen > >CC: Kees Cook > >CC: Will Drewry > >CC: Oleg Nesterov > >CC: Andy Lutomirski > >CC: Pavel Emelyanov > >CC: Serge E. Hallyn > >CC: Alexei Starovoitov > >CC: Daniel Borkmann > [...] > >diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c > >index dc9b464..58ae9f4 100644 > >--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c > >+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c > >@@ -586,6 +586,44 @@ free_prog: > > return err; > > } > > > >+static int bpf_prog_dump(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr) > >+{ > >+ int ufd = attr->prog_fd; > >+ struct fd f = fdget(ufd); > >+ struct bpf_prog *prog; > >+ int ret = -EINVAL; > >+ > >+ prog = get_prog(f); > >+ if (IS_ERR(prog)) > >+ return PTR_ERR(prog); > >+ > >+ /* For now, let's refuse to dump anything that isn't a seccomp program. > >+ * Other program types have support for maps, which our current dump > >+ * code doesn't support. > >+ */ > >+ if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_SECCOMP) > >+ goto out; > > Yep, also when you start adding helper calls (next to map objects) you'd > need to undo kernel pointers that the verifier sets here. Good point, I'll add that to the comment as well. Tycho