From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Dannenberg Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/15] power: bq24257: Add basic support for bq24250/bq24251 Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 08:38:10 -0500 Message-ID: <20150928133810.GB12676@borg> References: <1443196460-26156-1-git-send-email-dannenberg@ti.com> <1443196460-26156-7-git-send-email-dannenberg@ti.com> <56093D50.5010604@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56093D50.5010604@samsung.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Sebastian Reichel , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , David Woodhouse , Laurentiu Palcu , Ramakrishna Pallala , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:14:56PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > W dniu 26.09.2015 o 00:54, Andreas Dannenberg pisze: > > This patch adds basic support for bq24250 and bq24251 which are very > > similar to the bq24257 the driver was originally written for. Basic > > support means the ability to select a device through Kconfig, DT and > > ACPI, an instance variable allowing to check which chip is active, and > > the reporting back of the selected device through the model_name power > > supply sysfs property. > > > > This patch by itself is not sufficient to actually use those two added > > devices in a real-world setting due to some feature differences which > > are addressed by other patches in this series. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg > > For the second time (after 1st patch changing DT documentation) I am > confused - my reviewed-by was not added. > > I assume it got lost due to misunderstanding or something else but > anyway I won't insist. If you want it, just let me know. Hi Krzysztof, thanks for the reviewed-by's. Yes there was a misunderstanding. Will make sure to carry them forward from now on. Regards, -- Andreas Dannenberg Texas Instruments Inc