From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/13] support "task_isolation" mode for nohz_full
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:53:04 +0100
Message-ID: <20160112105304.GA12675@gmail.com>
References: <1451936091-29247-1-git-send-email-cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
 <56941B86.9090009@ezchip.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56941B86.9090009-d5a29ZRxExrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf-d5a29ZRxExrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef <giladb-d5a29ZRxExrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>, Rik van Riel <riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl-vYTEC60ixJUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org


* Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf-d5a29ZRxExrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> Ping!  There has been no substantive feedback to this version of
> the patch in the week since I posted it, which optimistically suggests
> to me that people may be satisfied with it.  If that's true, Frederic,
> I assume this would be pulled into your tree?

We are right before (and into) the merge window, don't expect substantial feedback 
in those timeframes, as most kernel maintainers are very busy.

Thanks,

	Ingo