From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/22] kthread: Add create_kthread_worker*() Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 13:53:39 -0500 Message-ID: <20160125185339.GB3628@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <1453736711-6703-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> <1453736711-6703-5-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453736711-6703-5-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Petr Mladek Cc: Andrew Morton , Oleg Nesterov , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , "Paul E. McKenney" , Josh Triplett , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Jiri Kosina , Borislav Petkov , Michal Hocko , linux-mm@kvack.org, Vlastimil Babka , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:44:53PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > +struct kthread_worker * > +create_kthread_worker_on_cpu(int cpu, const char namefmt[]) > +{ > + if (cpu < 0 || cpu > num_possible_cpus()) > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); Comparing cpu ID to num_possible_cpus() doesn't make any sense. It should either be testing against cpu_possible_mask or testing against nr_cpu_ids. Does this test need to be in this function at all? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org