From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] getcpu_cache: wire up ARM system call Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 18:19:15 +0000 Message-ID: <20160127181915.GA10826@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1453913683-28915-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <1453913683-28915-3-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453913683-28915-3-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Paul Turner , Andrew Hunter , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Andy Lutomirski , Andi Kleen , Dave Watson , Chris Lameter , Ingo Molnar , Ben Maurer , Steven Rostedt , "Paul E. McKenney" , Josh Triplett , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Michael Kerrisk List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:54:42AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Wire up the getcpu cache system call on 32-bit ARM. Call the You should note that your chosen system call number of 391 is temporary here and can't be relied upon as we have to wire up the new copy_file_range() call on ARM (which I've just committed the patch for.) I'd much prefer the wiring up to be either an entirely separate patch (which must be submitted to me, and I'll merge between -rc1 and -rc2 along with any other syscall updates) or you leave the wiring up to me. This is so that I can ensure that (a) system calls numbers are not duplicated and (b) ensure that we follow the same logical order as x86 where possible. Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.