From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joonsoo Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: introduce page reference manipulation functions Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:11:34 +0900 Message-ID: <20160225021134.GA14784@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> References: <1456212078-22732-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> <20160223153244.83a5c3ca430c4248a4a34cc0@linux-foundation.org> <20160225003454.GB9723@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <20160224175333.8957903d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160224175333.8957903d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Michal Nazarewicz , Minchan Kim , Mel Gorman , Vlastimil Babka , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:53:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:34:55 +0900 Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > > > > > The patches will be a bit of a pain to maintain but surprisingly they > > > apply OK at present. It's possible that by the time they hit upstream, > > > some direct ->_count references will still be present and it will > > > require a second pass to complete the conversion. > > > > In fact, the patch doesn't change direct ->_count reference for > > *read*. That's the reason that it is surprisingly OK at present. > > > > It's a good idea to change direct ->_count reference even for read. > > How about changing it in rc2 after mering this patch in rc1? > > Sounds fair enough. > > Although I'm counting only 11 such sites so perhaps we just go ahead > and do it? Okay. It's less than I thought. I will do it soon. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org