From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: THP-enabled filesystem vs. FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:26:03 +0300 Message-ID: <20160304112603.GA9790@node.shutemov.name> References: <1457023939-98083-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1457023939-98083-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Hugh Dickins , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Dave Hansen , Vlastimil Babka , Christoph Lameter , Naoya Horiguchi , Jerome Marchand , Yang Shi , Sasha Levin , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 07:51:50PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > Truncate and punch hole that only cover part of THP range is implemented > by zero out this part of THP. > > This have visible effect on fallocate(FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE) behaviour. > As we don't really create hole in this case, lseek(SEEK_HOLE) may have > inconsistent results depending what pages happened to be allocated. > Not sure if it should be considered ABI break or not. Looks like this shouldn't be a problem. man 2 fallocate: Within the specified range, partial filesystem blocks are zeroed, and whole filesystem blocks are removed from the file. After a successful call, subsequent reads from this range will return zeroes. It means we effectively have 2M filesystem block size. And I don't see any guarantee about subsequent lseek(SEEK_HOLE) beheviour. -- Kirill A. Shutemov