From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] cgroup namespaces: add a 'nsroot=' mountinfo field Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:12:35 -0400 Message-ID: <20160413191235.GA20142@htj.duckdns.org> References: <20160321234133.GA22463@mail.hallyn.com> <20160413175736.GC3676@htj.duckdns.org> <20160413184639.GA29483@mail.hallyn.com> <20160413185033.GH3676@htj.duckdns.org> <20160413190152.GA29753@mail.hallyn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160413190152.GA29753-7LNsyQBKDXoIagZqoN9o3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, adityakali-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Linux Containers , "Eric W. Biederman" , cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, lkml List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 02:01:52PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > I don't think so - we could be in a cgroup namespace but still have > access only to bind-mounted cgroups. So we need to compare the > superblock dentry root field to the nsroot= value. I see. No objection then. Thanks. -- tejun