From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] vfs: Define new syscall getumask. Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 23:47:03 -0400 Message-ID: <20160413234703.615f3016@grimm.local.home> References: <1460552272-15985-1-git-send-email-rjones@redhat.com> <20160413135950.GA12128@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160413135950.GA12128@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: "Richard W.M. Jones" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, luto@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, zab@redhat.com, emunson@akamai.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aarcange@redhat.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, xemul@parallels.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, milosz@adfin.com, arnd@arndb.de, ebiederm@xmission.com, gorcunov@openvz.org, iulia.manda21@gmail.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, mguzik@redhat.com, adobriyan@gmail.com, dave@stgolabs.net, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, gorcunov@gmail.com, fw@deneb.enyo.de List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 06:59:50 -0700 Greg KH wrote: > Why not add this to the ktest infrastructure, we strongly encourage that > for new syscalls, along with a man page patch. Do you mean the "selftest infrastructure"? As I don't see how this could be used with ktest. See tools/testing/selftests/ -- Steve