* Re: [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: support clone_file_range
[not found] ` <20160717062427.56718-3-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
@ 2016-07-19 3:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-19 4:48 ` Jaegeuk Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2016-07-19 3:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaegeuk Kim; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-api, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:24:27PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This patch implements clone_file_range in f2fs.
[...]
> +int f2fs_clone_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> + struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out, u64 len)
> +{
> + return f2fs_clone_files(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, len);
> +}
> +
Falling back from copy to clone should be done in the VFS. I look into
implementing the fallback, and the code is trivial, but we don't seem
to have any useful coverage for copy_file_range yet, so I didn't dare
to add it yet. How did you test copy and clone in f2fs? And how did
you handle the difference in corner cases (e.g. the lacking 0 special
case in copy)?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning
reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: support clone_file_range
2016-07-19 3:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: support clone_file_range Christoph Hellwig
@ 2016-07-19 4:48 ` Jaegeuk Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-07-19 4:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-api, linux-kernel, linux-f2fs-devel
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 08:47:36PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:24:27PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > This patch implements clone_file_range in f2fs.
>
> [...]
>
> > +int f2fs_clone_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> > + struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out, u64 len)
> > +{
> > + return f2fs_clone_files(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, len);
> > +}
> > +
>
> Falling back from copy to clone should be done in the VFS. I look into
> implementing the fallback, and the code is trivial, but we don't seem
> to have any useful coverage for copy_file_range yet, so I didn't dare
> to add it yet. How did you test copy and clone in f2fs? And how did
> you handle the difference in corner cases (e.g. the lacking 0 special
> case in copy)?
Frankly speaking, I confused the behaviors without being aware of corner cases.
And thus, I dropped the patches already. Instead, I realized that what I did
was moving a range of blocks from one file to another file. So, I've been
testing a new ioctl, F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE.
In terms of coverage, I just did some unit tests only.
Thanks,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning
reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-19 4:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20160717062427.56718-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20160717062427.56718-3-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
2016-07-19 3:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: support clone_file_range Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-19 4:48 ` Jaegeuk Kim
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).