Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/syscalls: allow multiple syscall numbers per syscall

[Steven Rostedt <rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>]

On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:24:56 +0200
Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 12:53:53 PM CEST Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > Egads!  OK, I see why this is a mess.
> > 
> > I guess we should be creating the metadata from the syscall tables
> > instead of from the syscall definitions, but I guess that's currently
> > a nasty per-arch mess.
> >   
> 
> I've been thinking for a while about how to improve the situation
> around adding new syscalls, which currently involves adding a number
> and an entry in a .S file on most architectures (some already have
> their own method to simplify it, and others using a shared table
> in asm-generic).
> 
> I was thinking of extending the x86 way of doing this to all
> architectures, and adding a way to have all future syscalls require
> only one addition in a single file that gets included by the
> architecture specific files for the existing syscalls.
> 
> Assuming we do this, would that work for generating the metadata
> from the same file like we do with
> arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall{tbl,hdr}.sh ?

I can't answer this because I'm not sure exactly how you would do this.
Perhaps you could give it a try and code will be the answer to all my
questions ;-)

-- Steve