From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: Build failures in -next: sys_pkey_mprotect etc. undefined Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:33:44 -0700 Message-ID: <20160912203344.GB2516@roeck-us.net> References: <9d74497b-1522-b350-42fa-49df2df48c4a@roeck-us.net> <57D70B6D.6010208@linux.intel.com> <3540553.8BkpiafJJ2@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3540553.8BkpiafJJ2@wuerfel> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , "open list:ABI/API" , linux-arch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:28:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday, September 12, 2016 1:09:17 PM CEST Dave Hansen wrote: > > > > So, I've done what Arnd suggested, but I don't have a working > > cross-compiler than can do h8300 or c6x. Could you test the attached > > patch and see if it gets things working for you? > > > > Also, do you have a handy place to grab a cross-compiler for h8300 > > without having to build one? The kernel.org ones don't seem to work for > > h8300. > > > > I haven't tested it, but it looks good to me > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > FWIW, you should be able to test this with an arm64 cross-compiler > too, many distros ship one. > arm64 builds fine, though, even w/o this patch (at least for me). Guenter