From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: convert to generated system call tables Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 17:57:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20161021165721.GD1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> References: <3851270.xZRcP9hae0@wuerfel> <20161021133708.GA1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <4337157.Eff9E2riVH@wuerfel> <20161021154856.GC1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Joseph Myers Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-arch , linux-api List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 04:48:36PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > To stop adding OABI syscalls altogether. I'm sure that there will > > come a point (if it hasn't already) that glibc no longer supports > > OABI, and at that point it probably becomes rather silly to keep > > adding OABI syscalls. > > glibc hasn't supported OABI since 2012 (support removed in version 2.16 > released 2012-06-30). GCC support was also removed in 2012 (removal > released in version 4.8, released 2013-03-22). Right, so arguably its pointless adding new syscalls to OABI anymore. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.