From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] user-namespaced file capabilities - now with even more magic Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 07:42:42 -0600 Message-ID: <20161209134242.GA20577@mail.hallyn.com> References: <20161119151739.GA16398@mail.hallyn.com> <87inqvav4y.fsf@xmission.com> <20161208045640.GA433@mail.hallyn.com> <87oa0ljzq0.fsf@xmission.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87oa0ljzq0.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Seth Forshee , lkml , linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org): > "Serge E. Hallyn" writes: > > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 05:43:09PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> "Serge E. Hallyn" writes: > > >> Any chance of a singed-off-by? > > > > Yes, sorry, Stéphane had pointed out that I'd apparently forgotten to do > > -s. Do you want me to resend the whole shebang, or does > > > > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn > > > > suffice? (My previous iterations did have it fwiw so I don't think I could > > legally disavow it now :) > > I was really hoping to get this in this for 4.10, but I am seeing a couple > of little things in my review. Comments referring to a non-existent v4 > and a few other niggling little things so I am going to target this for > the next kernel release so there is time review. With a little luck I > can place this patch in my for-next tree just after the merge window > closes and 4.10-rc1 ships. Ok, thanks. This is not something I'd want to rush :)