From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Hrubis Subject: Re: utimensat EACCES vs. EPERM in 4.8+ Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:43:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20170117154312.GB28074@rei.lan> References: <18a5b416-ad6a-e679-d993-af7ffa0dcc10@redhat.com> <280513509.810300.1484639500985.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20170117075702.GB10417@rei.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: Jan Stancek , mtk manpages , linux-fsdevel , viro , guaneryu-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, ltp-cunTk1MwBs91InPhgRC9rw@public.gmane.org, Linux API , Dave Chinner List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > Actually credit goes to SUSE QAM that caught the change on kernel > > update :-). > > And while this makes for a nice discussion, it is almost completely > irrelevant in real life, since the only thing broken by this change > will be test suites (in other words immutable files are rare as hen's > teeth). We do have documentation and code out of sync so this is a valid bug regardless of which one of them ends up fixed in the end... -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org