From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] mm: Introduce wrappers to access mm->nr_ptes Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2017 15:54:49 +0300 Message-ID: <20171008125449.kgzjilgxzbropewj@node.shutemov.name> References: <20171005101442.49555-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <7e476fd2-5818-c395-cdf2-00b5229c1a73@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7e476fd2-5818-c395-cdf2-00b5229c1a73@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Hansen Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Michal Hocko List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 04:10:31PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 10/05/2017 03:14 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/hugetlbpage.c > > @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static void hugetlb_free_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, pmd_t *pmd, > > > > pmd_clear(pmd); > > pte_free_tlb(tlb, token, addr); > > - atomic_long_dec(&tlb->mm->nr_ptes); > > + mm_dec_nr_ptes(tlb->mm); > > } > > If we're going to go replace all of these, I wonder if we should start > doing it more generically. > > mm_dec_nr_pgtable(PGTABLE_PTE, tlb->mm) > > or even: > > mm_dec_nr_pgtable(PGTABLE_LEVEL1, tlb->mm) > > Instead of having a separate batch of functions for each level. We don't have this kind of consolidation for any other page table related helpers. Don't see a reason to start here. This kind of changes can be part of overal page table privitives redesign once/if we get there. But feel free to send patches. :) -- Kirill A. Shutemov