From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney"
<paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Hunter <ahh-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Maged Michael
<maged.michael-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi-VrcmuVmyx1hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Andrea Parri
<parri.andrea-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Russell King <linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
David Sehr <sehr-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Linus Torvalds
<torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers-vg+e7yoeK/fQFizaE/u3fw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v5 for 4.15 03/10] membarrier: Document scheduler barrier requirements
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 16:37:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171110213717.12457-4-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171110213717.12457-1-mathieu.desnoyers-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Document the membarrier requirement on having a full memory barrier in
__schedule() after coming from user-space, before storing to rq->curr.
It is provided by smp_mb__after_spinlock() in __schedule().
Document that membarrier requires a full barrier on transition from
kernel thread to userspace thread. We currently have an implicit barrier
from atomic_dec_and_test() in mmdrop() that ensures this.
The x86 switch_mm_irqs_off() full barrier is currently provided by many
cpumask update operations as well as write_cr3(). Document that
write_cr3() provides this barrier.
Changes since v1:
- Update comments to match reality for code paths which are after
storing to rq->curr, before returning to user-space, based on feedback
from Andrea Parri.
Changes since v2:
- Update changelog (smp_mb__before_spinlock -> smp_mb__after_spinlock).
Based on feedback from Andrea Parri.
Changes since v3:
- Clarify comments following feeback from Peter Zijlstra.
Changes since v4:
- Update comment regarding powerpc barrier.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
CC: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
CC: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
CC: Andrew Hunter <ahh-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
CC: Maged Michael <maged.michael-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi-VrcmuVmyx1hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org>
CC: Dave Watson <davejwatson-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
CC: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
CC: x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
---
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 5 +++++
include/linux/sched/mm.h | 5 +++++
kernel/sched/core.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 3118392cdf75..5abf9bfcca1f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -146,6 +146,11 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
#endif
this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.is_lazy, false);
+ /*
+ * The membarrier system call requires a full memory barrier
+ * before returning to user-space, after storing to rq->curr.
+ * Writing to CR3 provides that full memory barrier.
+ */
if (real_prev == next) {
VM_WARN_ON(this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.ctxs[prev_asid].ctx_id) !=
next->context.ctx_id);
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
index 7077253d0df4..0f9e1a96b890 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
@@ -39,6 +39,11 @@ static inline void mmgrab(struct mm_struct *mm)
extern void __mmdrop(struct mm_struct *);
static inline void mmdrop(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
+ /*
+ * The implicit full barrier implied by atomic_dec_and_test is
+ * required by the membarrier system call before returning to
+ * user-space, after storing to rq->curr.
+ */
if (unlikely(atomic_dec_and_test(&mm->mm_count)))
__mmdrop(mm);
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 0ac96e8329d5..c79e94278613 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2688,6 +2688,12 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers(current);
+ /*
+ * When transitioning from a kernel thread to a userspace
+ * thread, mmdrop()'s implicit full barrier is required by the
+ * membarrier system call, because the current active_mm can
+ * become the current mm without going through switch_mm().
+ */
if (mm)
mmdrop(mm);
if (unlikely(prev_state == TASK_DEAD)) {
@@ -2793,6 +2799,13 @@ context_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
*/
arch_start_context_switch(prev);
+ /*
+ * If mm is non-NULL, we pass through switch_mm(). If mm is
+ * NULL, we will pass through mmdrop() in finish_task_switch().
+ * Both of these contain the full memory barrier required by
+ * membarrier after storing to rq->curr, before returning to
+ * user-space.
+ */
if (!mm) {
next->active_mm = oldmm;
mmgrab(oldmm);
@@ -3329,6 +3342,9 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt)
* Make sure that signal_pending_state()->signal_pending() below
* can't be reordered with __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
* done by the caller to avoid the race with signal_wake_up().
+ *
+ * The membarrier system call requires a full memory barrier
+ * after coming from user-space, before storing to rq->curr.
*/
rq_lock(rq, &rf);
smp_mb__after_spinlock();
@@ -3377,17 +3393,16 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt)
/*
* The membarrier system call requires each architecture
* to have a full memory barrier after updating
- * rq->curr, before returning to user-space. For TSO
- * (e.g. x86), the architecture must provide its own
- * barrier in switch_mm(). For weakly ordered machines
- * for which spin_unlock() acts as a full memory
- * barrier, finish_lock_switch() in common code takes
- * care of this barrier. For weakly ordered machines for
- * which spin_unlock() acts as a RELEASE barrier (only
- * arm64 and PowerPC), arm64 has a full barrier in
- * switch_to(), and PowerPC has
- * smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() before
- * finish_lock_switch().
+ * rq->curr, before returning to user-space.
+ *
+ * Here are the schemes providing that barrier on the
+ * various architectures:
+ * - mm ? switch_mm() : mmdrop() for x86, s390, sparc, PowerPC.
+ * switch_mm() rely on membarrier_arch_switch_mm() on PowerPC.
+ * - finish_lock_switch() for weakly-ordered
+ * architectures where spin_unlock is a full barrier,
+ * - switch_to() for arm64 (weakly-ordered, spin_unlock
+ * is a RELEASE barrier),
*/
++*switch_count;
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-10 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-10 21:37 [RFC PATCH for 4.15 0/9] membarrier updates for 4.15 Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <20171110213717.12457-1-mathieu.desnoyers-vg+e7yoeK/dWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2017-11-10 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 01/10] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited cmd Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-10 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH v7 for 4.15 02/10] membarrier: powerpc: Skip memory barrier in switch_mm() Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-10 21:37 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2017-11-10 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 04/10] membarrier: Provide core serializing command Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-10 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 05/10] x86: Introduce sync_core_before_usermode Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-10 22:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
[not found] ` <CALCETrWV+bgUPoS7NqVYhoi7hOyvsfoWw5CnyMrkYz=HYznmXQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-11-10 22:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-10 22:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-10 23:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-10 22:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-10 22:39 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-10 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 06/10] Fix: x86: Add missing core serializing instruction on migration Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-10 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH v2 for 4.15 07/10] membarrier: x86: Provide core serializing command Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-10 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 08/10] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited sync core cmd Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-10 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 09/10] membarrier: provide SHARED_EXPEDITED command Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-10 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 10/10] membarrier: selftest: Test shared expedited cmd Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171110213717.12457-4-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers-vg+e7yoek/dwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ahh-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=avi-VrcmuVmyx1hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=boqun.feng-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davejwatson-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ghackmann-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=luto-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=maged.michael-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers-vg+e7yoeK/fQFizaE/u3fw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mpe-Gsx/Oe8HsFggBc27wqDAHg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=parri.andrea-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sehr-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).