linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-api <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, crml <criu@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] userfaultfd: non-cooperative: allow synchronous EVENT_REMOVE
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 10:26:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180228082613.GD15048@rapoport-lnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1a2ed216-74ac-5fe2-abff-21d670eeb96d@virtuozzo.com>

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:21:02AM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> 
> > @@ -52,6 +53,7 @@
> >  #define _UFFDIO_WAKE			(0x02)
> >  #define _UFFDIO_COPY			(0x03)
> >  #define _UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE		(0x04)
> > +#define _UFFDIO_WAKE_SYNC_EVENT		(0x05)
> 
> Excuse my ignorance, but what's the difference between UFFDIO_WAKE and UFFDIO_WAKE_SYNC_EVENT?

UFFDIO_WAKE is used when UFFDIO_COPY/UFFDIO_ZERO page are used with
UFFDIO_*_MODE_DONTWAKE flag set and it presumes 'struct uffdio_range'
argument to the ioctl(). Since waking up a non page fault event requires
different parameters I've add new ioctl to keep backwards compatibility.
 
> -- Pavel
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-28  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-27  8:19 [PATCH 0/3] userfaultfd: non-cooperative: syncronous events Mike Rapoport
2018-02-27  8:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] userfaultfd: introduce userfaultfd_init_waitqueue helper Mike Rapoport
2018-02-27  8:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] userfaultfd: non-cooperative: generalize wake key structure Mike Rapoport
2018-02-27  8:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] userfaultfd: non-cooperative: allow synchronous EVENT_REMOVE Mike Rapoport
2018-02-28  8:21   ` Pavel Emelyanov
2018-02-28  8:26     ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2018-03-02 23:38 ` [PATCH 0/3] userfaultfd: non-cooperative: syncronous events Andrew Morton
2018-03-03  9:09   ` Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180228082613.GD15048@rapoport-lnx \
    --to=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=criu@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=xemul@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).