From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 06/10] tracepoint: compute num_args at build time Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:35:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20180326123530.66ced6ae@gandalf.local.home> References: <20180324023038.938665-1-ast@fb.com> <20180324023038.938665-7-ast@fb.com> <20180326110204.042801dd@gandalf.local.home> <1787605856.4574.1522077244597.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <5bcacdb5-e72f-b67a-4884-61fcedf0938a@fb.com> <523311773.184.1522079745421.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <1055377367.195.1522081045131.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <89fbc745-c290-c82c-a837-8998cf2988e7@fb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <89fbc745-c290-c82c-a837-8998cf2988e7@fb.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , "David S. Miller" , Daniel Borkmann , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , netdev , kernel-team , linux-api , "Frank Ch. Eigler" List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 09:25:07 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > commit log of patch 6 states: > > "for_each_tracepoint_range() api has no users inside the kernel. > Make it more useful with ability to stop for_each() loop depending > via callback return value. > In such form it's used in subsequent patch." > > and in patch 7: > > +static void *__find_tp(struct tracepoint *tp, void *priv) > +{ > + char *name = priv; > + > + if (!strcmp(tp->name, name)) > + return tp; > + return NULL; > +} > ... > + struct tracepoint *tp; > ... > + tp = for_each_kernel_tracepoint(__find_tp, tp_name); > + if (!tp) > + return -ENOENT; > > still not obvious? Please just create a new function called tracepoint_find_by_name(), and use that. I don't see any benefit in using a for_each* function for such a simple routine. Not to mention, you then don't need to know the internals of a tracepoint in kernel/bpf/syscall.c. -- Steve