linux-api.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/32] vfs: Allow cloning of a mount tree with open(O_PATH|O_CLONE_MOUNT) [ver #8]
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 07:39:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180601063928.GS30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180601062654.GA32397@infradead.org>

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:26:54PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 01:08:38AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Make it possible to clone a mount tree with a new pair of open flags that
> > are used in conjunction with O_PATH:
> > 
> >  (1) O_CLONE_MOUNT - Clone the mount or mount tree at the path.
> > 
> >  (2) O_NON_RECURSIVE - Don't clone recursively.
> 
> Err.  I don't think we should use up two O_* flags for something
> only useful for your new mount API.  Don't we have a better place
> to for these flags?
> 
> Instead of overloading this on open having a specific syscalls just
> seems like a much saner idea.

It's not just mount API; these can be used independently of that.
Think of the uses where you pass those to ...at() and you'll see
a bunch of applications of that thing.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-01  6:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <152720672288.9073.9868393448836301272.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
     [not found] ` <152720691829.9073.10564431140980997005.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
2018-06-01  6:26   ` [PATCH 30/32] vfs: Allow cloning of a mount tree with open(O_PATH|O_CLONE_MOUNT) [ver #8] Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-01  6:39     ` Al Viro [this message]
2018-06-01  8:27     ` David Howells
2018-06-02  3:09       ` Al Viro
2018-06-02  3:42         ` Al Viro
2018-06-02  4:04           ` Al Viro
2018-06-02 15:45           ` David Howells
2018-06-02 17:49             ` Al Viro
2018-06-03  0:55               ` [PATCH][RFC] open_tree(2) (was Re: [PATCH 30/32] vfs: Allow cloning of a mount tree with open(O_PATH|O_CLONE_MOUNT) [ver #8]) Al Viro
2018-06-04 10:34                 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-06-04 15:52                   ` Al Viro
2018-06-04 15:59                     ` Al Viro
2018-06-04 19:27                     ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-06-04 15:27                 ` David Howells
2018-06-04 17:16                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-06-04 17:35                   ` Al Viro
2018-06-04 19:38                     ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-06-01  8:02   ` [PATCH 30/32] vfs: Allow cloning of a mount tree with open(O_PATH|O_CLONE_MOUNT) [ver #8] Amir Goldstein
2018-06-01  8:42   ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180601063928.GS30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).