From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.18] rseq: use __u64 for rseq_cs fields,
 validate user inputs
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 20:10:28 +0200
Message-ID: <20180703181028.GA2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20180703082955.GH3704@osiris>
 <20180703084312.GU2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20180703085546.GJ3704@osiris>
 <20180703092113.GV2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20180703164048.i2te5gjemcafqzwf@two.firstfloor.org>
 <CA+55aFzYEQgEhCnrwtbGuCy36Wh+aiw0_9rgMcjUgbn1JtZAPQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180703173451.GX2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <399697782.11820.1530639539750.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
 <20180703174833.GZ2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CA+55aFxcVbG2DMmmrW-HLTXZE+rcBWc5F48UYoL2heEsEpyO=g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxcVbG2DMmmrW-HLTXZE+rcBWc5F48UYoL2heEsEpyO=g@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>, Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Ben Maurer <bmaurer@fb.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.m>
List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:59:45AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 10:49 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I can simply document that loads/stores from/to all struct rseq fields
> > > should be thread-local then ?
> >
> > I'm not sure that covers things sufficiently. You really want the
> > userspace load/stores to be single instructions.
> 
> Actually, I think we should try very hard to limit even that to _just_
> the rseq pointer itself.

> So I'd suggest that the only part we aim to have any "atomic" behavior
> at all is for the individual fields in "struct rseq" itself. So the
> cpu id and the base pointer and the flags. And even they are
> thread-local, so the atomicity is not about the kernel, but about user
> space needing to read and update them in word-sized chunks.
> 
> End result: absolutely nothing is atomic for the kernel.

Yes, agreed, that is what I meant but very poorly expressed. Only the
rseq bits themselves need this single-copy atomic stuff -- for
userspace.