From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 10/27] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_DIRTY_SW Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:21:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20180711092117.GV2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180710222639.8241-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20180710222639.8241-11-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180710222639.8241-11-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Yu-cheng Yu Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Ravi V. Shan List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 03:26:22PM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > +static inline bool is_shstk_pte(pte_t pte) > +{ > + pteval_t val; > + > + val = pte_flags(pte) & (_PAGE_RW | _PAGE_DIRTY_HW); > + return (val == _PAGE_DIRTY_HW); > +} That's against naming convention here. static inline bool pte_shstk(pte_t pte) { return pte_flags(pte) & (_PAGE_RW | _PAGE_DIRTY_HW) == _PAGE_DIRTY_HW; } would be more in style with the rest of this code.